Drake Buys Neighbor’s Home After They Complained About Noise. I suppose it’s an option when you have more money than god. A shame all that money can’t buy him new stereocilia after he destroys his hearing.
ING Bank’s main data center was shut down by a loud noise. So what exactly happened, you ask? This:
[ING Bank] was testing an electronics-safe fire suppression system in the main data center, but a pressure discrepancy caused the system to emit a loud noise while expelling inert gas. According to the bank, the sound was measured a over 130dB — apparently loud enough to knock the HDD’s physical components out of alignment.
130 dB (probably A-weighted or dBA) is not to be sniffed at. It’s recommended that humans limit exposure at 130 dBA to “under one second.” If noise measuring 130 dBA is loud enough to knock out a few dozen hard drives, what will it do to you? It’s time you learned about noise-induced “hidden hearing loss.”
Quiet Communities has announced that South Pasadena has taken the first brave step forward and switched the maintenance of “all 41 acres (!) of municipal lands to advanced electric landscape maintenance equipment and manual tools.”
By transitioning to electric and manual tools, reports Quiet Communities, the city is:
[E]liminating toxic and carcinogenic emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, and hazardous waste associated with the use of gas-powered engines including hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides (ground level ozone precursors) fine particulate matter, carbon monoxide (CO), and carbon dioxide. All are known to contribute to serious health problems and environmental degradation. Schools, businesses, and parks can be enjoyed as peaceful public spaces. The new equipment will improve working conditions for grounds crews who will no longer have to expose themselves to deafening noise, harmful emissions, or equipment vibrations. Residents will enjoy a cleaner, healthier environment and improved quality of life.
Quiet Communities is bringing AGZA Green Zones to the East Coast. To learn more about creating an AGZA Green Zone, click the link above or contact Quiet Communities at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Data Proves That Effort To Quiet O’Hare Night Skies Working Only About Half The Time. DNAinfo.com reports that “[p]lanes landed and took off as promised 57 percent of the time during the first eight weeks of a test to rotate the O’Hare Airport runways used at night to give Northwest Side residents some relief from jet noise.” Apparently summer storms required air traffic controllers to divert from the plan, not allowing them to use runways that were supposed to keep certain areas quieter.
The reason for the test is that some residents complained that it was “impossible to get an uninterrupted night of sleep since an east-west runway opened in 2013.” In response, the airport has implemented “voluntary restrictions on nighttime operations at O’Hare, known as Fly Quiet, [which] encourage pilots and air traffic controllers to fly over expressways, industrial areas and forest preserves to reduce the noise over residential areas from 10 p.m.-7 a.m.” How nice. And yet:
Chicago Aviation Commissioner Ginger Evans has touted the rotation as a “big breakthrough” in city efforts to reduce the jet noise that prompted more than 4 million complaints in 2015. (emphasis added)
4 million jet noise complaints in one year.
Each element of noise in today’s world apparently stands on its own. Eventually people will have to recognize that all noise is noise and must be regulated in a fair manner so that people can sleep, think, and function. Keep an eye on this site, because help is coming.
You save money for a deposit, gird yourself as you plunk it down, and, finally, embrace home ownership. Congratulations! Sadly, a few years later a stretch of highway that had been planned finally opens and your peaceful home becomes a hellhole. As the residents of Feyetteville are learning, there are few options, especially for those who purchased homes in neigborhoods that did not predate the planning for the new stretch of road. Buyer beware.
Brits complain that minimalist decor and loud music are driving them away from restaurants. Action on Hearing Loss, a British charity, has conducted a survey in which they found that “90 per cent of people with hearing difficulties felt background noise was the biggest problem they faced when eating out.” The survey also found that “79 per cent of [respondents] said they had left an establishment early because of the sound levels and 91 per cent of those asked said they wouldn’t go back to a noisy venue.”
Not mentioned in the article is the theory that restauranteurs deliberately play loud music in an attempt to scare away older customers, since these restauranteurs must all covet a younger crowd that presumably loves stereocilia-destroying music. If true, they will no doubt ignore the advice offered in the articl to temper the loud volume, but they should not ignore the warning noted in the piece. Namely, Action on Hearing Loss “is now hoping to develop an app which will allow people to take a decibel recording for restaurants, posting it onto a forum and allowing people to avoid particularly noisy establishments.”
New Yorkers already have a tool they can use to help them avoid mind-numbingly loud restaurants. Our sister site, Quiet City Maps, reviews noise levels of restaurants, bars, coffee shops, parks and privately owned public spaces throughout the city. Click on the link to read the reviews and to check out the map, which shows you the good, the bad, and the ugly with easy to understand color icons. A mobile app is in the works, so please send any suggestions of (relatively) quiet places their way.
Long and short, a New Zealand library installed a noise device because of complaints by (presumably older) customers “about such issues as swearing, abuse, standover tactics and intimidating behaviour.” The device in question is marketed as an “ultrasonic teenage deterrent” that can be heard by anyone under the age of 25. Apparently these devices have been used elsewhere because we are told that, “politicians in the UK call[ed] for a ban [of the devices], saying they are discriminatory towards young people, discourage group gatherings and may be harmful to hearing.” And some children, particularly children with Down’s Syndrome or autism, are more sensitive to noise.
The idea of using weaponized noise to discourage teens from loitering outside a library is absolutely abhorrent. Yes, some teens revel in anti-social behavior, but as one child’s librarian noted, “I find it very strange they have decided to use this device during opening hours when really we all need be encouraging children to read.” We couldn’t have said it better ourselves. There must be a better way of discouraging anti-social behavior than treating everyone under the age of 25 years as part of the problem.
On September 24th the Noise Hackathon is presenting a series of fascinating talks that will look “into the complexities of noise including urban noise pollution and noise music to jump-start a full day of noise hacking.” One of the talks will be presented by Dr. Arline Bronzaft, one of the leading experts in environmental psychology, who will talk about the impact of noise on health, particularly the “non-auditory health risks and physiological disorders, including children’s learning skills, hypertension, sleep deprivation, and cardiovascular complications, as well as work productivity and social behavior.”
The September 24th Noise Hackathon is presented as part of NoiseGate Festival 2016, a “5-day music festival focusing on the environment, bringing awareness to spatial and urban noise pollution “in 3D” via Data-Driven, Art-Driven, Community-Driven efforts.” Admission to the Noise Hackathon is free. Just click the link to RSVP.
Residents want police crackdown on loud, fast motorcycles. The complaint isn’t against all motorcyclists–it never is. Rather, the residents in this article are angry at “[p]eople driving loud bikes, deliberately modified for the sole purpose of being extra loud and obnoxious.” We agree. Those extra loud tail pipes do not come with a new bike, by the way. They are aftermarket purchases, which clearly shows that rider is deliberately making noise because they want to. We believe that is called “anti-social behavior,” and the police should be citing motorcyclists who engage in this activity. Should. But the article highlights a problem with enforcement, namely that the police refuse to do it:
Lisgo would like to see every officer equipped with a simple sound-measuring device, just as officers are equipped with breathalyzers to check for impaired drivers. She said her efforts to persuade police to crack down so far have been unsuccessful.
“They tell me they just don’t have enough manpower and they have better things to do and I just don’t buy that.”
Either do we. Good luck to the residents of West Kootenay. We hope you are successful in stopping this scourge.
Thanks to Hyperacusis Research for the link.
No doubt someone may have found the performance annoying–busking is busking whatever the caliber of the performer. That said, there is nothing in the article linked above that suggests that the police were responding to a complaint. That is, it’s unclear whether they saw an opportunity to protect he streets from opera but were provoked into arresting the singer when she refused to shut down her amplified orchestral accompaniment.
Truth be told, we’re torn on who we should support in this story. On the one hand, we would prefer to not be bombarded by amplified sound. On the other, we wonder whether the police are normally as diligent when dealing with noise criminals. Adding that we wish the cops were as vigilant with motorcyclists sporting aftermarket tail pipes as they are with desperate opera singers carrying amplifiers.