Tag Archive: expensive

7 reasons to say no to fireworks

Lloyd Alter, the design editor for Treehugger.com, posted his annual rant about the dangers of fireworks.  In short, fireworks are a dangerous and stupid way to celebrate anything, and in exchange for the short-term pleasure of seeing things blow up in the air, here are the long-term consequences of using them:

They spew percholorates, particulates, heavy metals, CO₂ and ozone into the atmosphere, cause over 10,000 injuries a year, are cruel to animals, and can lead to hearing loss.

It’s not fun being a killjoy, but really, are fireworks necessary?

A lament about hearing aids

Jennifer Finney Boylan, The New York Times, wonders: “Glasses Are Cool. Why Aren’t Hearing Aids?

I can answer that for you Jennifer:

Hearing loss is stigmatized and hearing aids are expensive, rarely covered by insurance, and don’t work as well for hearing as glasses work for sight.

In short, there is nothing at all cool about an expensive bit of kit that doesn’t work that well and is assumed to be a device meant only for the elderly.

You’re welcome.

What’s better than a cheap hearing aid?

Photo credit: ReSound licensed under CC BY 3.0

by Daniel Fink, MD, Chair, The Quiet Coalition

The New York Times asked recently why hearing aids are so expensive. They should have stepped back and asked a more important question: What’s better than a cheap hearing aid?

A: Preserved natural hearing.

As a paper I presented at the 12th Congress of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Noise discussed, the scientific evidence suggests that significant hearing loss (25-40 decibel hearing loss) is probably not part of normal aging, but is actually noise-induced hearing loss in the vast majority of cases. Research supporting this conclusion includes studies of hearing done in populations not exposed to noise, different rates of hearing loss in males vs. females, decades of occupational studies correlating increased noise exposure with greater hearing loss, and recent laboratory experiments showing the molecular, genetic, and sub-cellular structural mechanisms by which noise damages the auditory system.

If you protect your hearing now–by avoiding noise exposure or using hearing protection (ear plugs and ear muffs) if you can’t–you shouldn’t need a hearing aid in the future.

Preserved natural hearing…it’s better than a cheap hearing aid!

Dr. Daniel Fink is a leading noise activist based in the Los Angeles area. He serves on the board of the American Tinnitus Association, is the interim chair of Quiet Communities’s Health Advisory Council, and is the founding chair of The Quiet Coalition, an organization of science, health, and legal professionals concerned about the impacts of noise on health, environment, learning, productivity, and quality of life in America.

The war against leaf blowers inches forward:

As another California city mulls ban on blowers of all types.  No doubt some people may wonder why others dedicate time and energy fighting something that seems fairly innocuous, at best, and merely annoying, at worst.  But leaf blowers are not just an annoyance.  Quiet Communities, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting our health, environment, and quality of life from the excessive use of industrial outdoor maintenance equipment, has documented the substantial health hazard leaf blowers pose to the health of the operator, those in the vicinity of the activity, and even our pets, too.

So hearing that Ojai, California is considering banning all blowers, both gas-powered and battery-powered, is encouraging.  And yes, there will be push back, but in the end the only reason not to ban leaf blowers is that the alternatives are more expensive.  A fact that is only true if you only consider the additional labor cost and ignore the savings to health and wellbeing.